Tagged: data Toggle Comment Threads | Keyboard Shortcuts

  • Bobby 1:58 pm on March 24, 2015 Permalink |
    Tags: content marketing, data,   

    What I Learned About Content Marketing by Analyzing… 

    What I Learned About Content Marketing by Analyzing 614 Posts.

    Everyone LOVES Content Marketing eh? This is a pretty good breakdown of what works and what doesn’t.

    tl;dr – Infographics are king, timing matters, guides are better than posts, people love data, and headlines should be descriptive and not vague (click bait).

     
  • Bobby 11:30 am on September 30, 2013 Permalink |
    Tags: data, , genius,   

    Genius Designer – Are you one? 

    So there has been a lot of talk lately as to what is the best approach to digital design. Should it be user focused? Should it be data driven? How much does any of that matter? Can data driven design be the wrong approach?

    Well last night my wife (@alexaseretti) and I got into a discussion about a 3rd type of designer or design team. The GENIUS DESIGNER. From a great article by Jared Spool:

    Genius design is a sophisticated approach to making design decisions. Through deep study of similar projects, a team learns what works and what doesn’t. This makes the team more valuable over time, bringing it to a new level with every subsequent project. We’re seeing more teams take the plunge with the genius design approach. It’s a great way to move away from the commoditization of design work, while delivering real value to clients.

    I personally consider myself a hybrid between a user focused designer and a genius designer (although I think that title is cheesy). My career has focused me on 4 particular “genius” subjects. Financial, eCommerce, Healthcare and more generically Branding. Any designer who has spent any amount of time with a client or working in-house has probably developed some of these “genius” skills.

    I think this all leads me to the approach Google has taken in the past couple of years. It’s a cross between focusing on the user and the data but letting the designer, the “genius”, add their 2 cents. They can really help focus the design taking into consideration the other factors and adding a style to things that is just as important. This has proven to work for them and it shows.

     
  • Bobby 9:59 am on May 2, 2011 Permalink |
    Tags: data, theory   

    LukeW | Death to Lorem Ipsum 

    LukeW | Death to Lorem Ipsum.

    Interesting philosophy here.

    I’ve long believed that real data delivers really effective design. Using actual content, information, and activity throughout the design process to inform and guide decisions results in product designs that scale well and communicate effectively.

    Thoughts?

     
    • mshaheen 10:12 am on May 2, 2011 Permalink | Log in to Reply

      His last paragraph is the significant one for me. I have always felt – and noticed – that all aspects of the project are important. The most successful work is informed work. If we have as many details as possible up front, each piece can inform the others. Designers can design to the content while writers can write to the design. It’s hard to find that sweet spot but all sides can benefit from the other work being ready. In the end, collaboration and communication help to allow this.

c
Compose new post
j
Next post/Next comment
k
Previous post/Previous comment
r
Reply
e
Edit
o
Show/Hide comments
t
Go to top
l
Go to login
h
Show/Hide help
shift + esc
Cancel